AI professional development for teachers in Ontario
For an Ontario teacher, AI professional development that is free, self-paced and built in the province starts with The Secondary AI: seven asynchronous modules, each with an AI coach embedded, free for any registered teacher. The seven map onto work Ontario teachers already have to do — assessment integrity against Growing Success, safeguarding against board acceptable-use policy, curriculum redesign against the Achievement Chart and destreamed Grade 9, and prompting that ends in a resource carrying a published expectation code. No cohort, no booking, no certificate: it is not an AQ course, and we say so on this page. Questions go to adam@thesecondary.ai.
Last verified November 2026

Seven modules, free, self-paced — the Ontario frameworks they answer, and what they are not
- Built for
- Secondary school teachers of Grades 9–12 courses in Ontario and across Canada, plus the department heads, curriculum leads and administrators who support them.
- The programme
- Seven asynchronous PD modules, each with an AI coach embedded: a pre-assessment, the teaching, a scenario-based check and a practical task you take into class.
- The seven modules
- AI Assessment Integrity Coach; AI Safeguarding & Risk Assessor; AI Systems & Limits Briefing Bot; AI Pedagogy Translator; Pedagogical Prompting Coach; Prompt Critique & Refinement Bot; Pedagogical Shift & Curriculum Rethink Coach.
- Where the Ontario frameworks land
- Assessment integrity talks to Growing Success and the Achievement Chart; curriculum rethink talks to the three-part lesson and destreamed MTH1W, SNC1W and ENL1W; the prompting modules finish inside the generators, where published Ontario expectation codes are in a picker.
- Format and cost
- Self-paced, any order, revisitable, no cohort. Free for any registered teacher on every plan, including the permanent $0 tier with no card.
- Student side
- Nine free student AI literacy modules you can assign with a share code, so a department is not teaching one thing to staff and another to students.
- What it is not
- Not an Additional Qualification course, not accredited through a faculty of education, and no certificate is issued. It does not replace your board’s PA day or your board’s AI policy.
- Built in
- Ontario, Canada, by an educator. Web-based, so it works on board Chromebooks, Macs, Windows machines and tablets.
- Contact
- adam@thesecondary.ai. Online 24/7; human replies by email on Eastern Time business days.
The credential question deserves a straight answer: these modules carry no AQ credit and issue no certificate. Only a course through an accredited faculty of education does that. Use this for practice, use an AQ for the credential.
Format, Ontario specificity, cost and whether a credential comes out of it
| Tool | Best for | Format | Ontario-specific | Cost | Credential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Secondary AI | An Ontario teacher who wants free, self-paced AI PD today | Seven asynchronous modules with an AI coach embedded in each | Built in Ontario; assessment integrity, curriculum rethink and prompting framed for Ontario practice; expectation codes in the generators | Free for any registered teacher | None issued; not an AQ |
| Your board’s PA days and consultants | Learning that carries your employer’s own interpretation of policy | Scheduled sessions, in person or online | Yes — it is your board’s own interpretation of policy | Free to employees | Recorded toward your annual learning plan |
| Ontario teachers’ federations and subject associations | Subject-specific sessions from people who know your discipline | Webinars, workshops, conferences, subject-specific sessions | Yes, province-wide and subject-specific | Often free or low cost to members | Varies |
| AQ courses at Ontario faculties of education | A formal AQ credit toward OCT qualifications | Multi-week accredited courses | Ontario curriculum and policy as course content | Paid tuition | AQ credit; the only route to one |
| Ministry guidance and board AI policy | The authoritative rules you must follow, not PD you complete | Documents and directives | Yes — the authoritative source | Free | None; it is policy, not PD |
| MagicSchool | On-demand courses beside a US-standards template library | On-demand courses and webinars | No; US standards alignment | Free tier plus paid courses | Vendor certificate in some courses |
| Google for Education | A Google certification path in a Gemini-centred course | Generative AI for Educators; Educator certifications | No; Gemini-centred and US-framed | Free course; paid certification | Google certification |
| ISTE+ASCD | A paid US-framework course with a formal cohort | Courses and membership PD | No; US frameworks | Paid | Vendor certificate |
What each route offers as of November 2026. Ontario PD is negotiated locally, so the first three rows are the ones your board and federation control, and the only one of those that carries formal credit is an AQ course. Use the table to decide what each route is actually for rather than to rank them.
Competitor details come from each vendor's own published material, checked November 2026: MagicSchool. Products change, so confirm anything that decides your choice with the vendor directly.
Start where your worry actually is, not at module one
What is left to evaluate when AI can produce the obvious version of the task, how to gather evidence you can defend at a moderation meeting, and how to design work where the thinking is visible.
The risks that sit under a board acceptable-use policy: exposure to inappropriate content, student data, over-reliance, and the emotional dynamics of a tool that is endlessly patient and never disagrees.
How a language model actually works, where it fails and why, and how to set expectations with colleagues and students who believe it either knows everything or nothing.
How Socratic dialogue, project-based learning and error-based learning translate into AI-assisted practice, and where a three-part lesson survives the translation.
Writing prompts that produce something worth teaching with — including selecting the Ontario expectation code so the output arrives attached to the expectation.
Reading an output against the expectation you set, naming what is generic or wrong, and refining until the prompt reliably produces what you meant.
Redesigning units when the achievement chart stays the same but the evidence has to change, including destreamed Grade 9 classes where the range in the room is the real design constraint.
The part a vendor should never blur
Ontario AI questions are settled locally. Your board decides what tools are approved, how AI use is recorded, whether students need consent forms, and what happens when an incident occurs. None of that can be taught by a product page, and none of it is on this one. What the safeguarding and assessment modules do is give you the reasoning to arrive at that meeting with something to say — a risk you had already named, or a task design that makes the question of detection smaller than it was.
The frameworks worth holding any AI PD to in Ontario are Growing Success and its achievement chart, the Learning Skills and Work Habits, the three-part lesson, and the destreamed Grade 9 courses MTH1W, SNC1W and ENL1W. A module that never names them is not Ontario PD, however good the slides are.
If your board wants a session rather than a module, or a suggested sequence for a department on one PA day, write to adam@thesecondary.ai and we will answer with what we actually have rather than a brochure.
Start with the module that matches your problem
Free for any registered teacher, in any order, revisit whenever the policy changes. The prompt and curriculum modules finish inside the generators, so you leave with a resource carrying a published expectation code.
Continue Reading
Ontario-Built AI Tools for Teachers: What's Available, and Who Is Each One For?
A sourced overview of three Ontario and Canadian education-technology companies — Almanack, Simple Mondays, and Knowledgehook — and the different teaching tasks each one supports.
Almanack vs Simple Mondays: Two Different Centres of Gravity
Both are Canadian, both use AI, and both generate lesson plans and worksheets. The useful difference is what each product is organised around: curriculum or the teacher's week.
Best AI Tool for Secondary Teachers Back to School
The first week of school sets the tone for the year. Here is the AI that gets you through it, for preparation and student learning, in one place.